Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

…The divided city.
He asked me about my first impression of Jerusalem and the first impression is its beautiful, the second it’s so divided and so unfair in so many ways. I’ve asked myself the question about if woman should be protected by law for covering up and I said to myself, but so many want this … because that’s what they say when they got to be heard in interviews.

My taught now are different. Last night we walked at Mea Shea rim the orthodox Jewish street. A sign at beginning at the street tells woman to please cover themselves. They have (if you guys remember Bruno running around chased by the fashion police) some people that actually tells woman that doesn’t dress according to the code, to go away from their street. It’s not a law but it’s in the Jewish context, woman shall dress their gender, especially when married. In Europe we blame Muslims for the burke, here so far I have had more strict rules with the Jews. It feels weird for me, the man in my company only have to wear a little Jewish kippa at their head, I have to cover . (more…)

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Rooftop view

Morning company outside hostel

The holy wall

King Davids Tomb

And you can never leave the crypt ….

More to v\come att flickr when we have better internet connection

Read Full Post »

Now when It´s getting closer to my take off for Jerusalem, I have noticed a slight increase of worries in my surroundings.
From people saying: “Are you not worried to go?” til ” I hope you get home alive!”
-Seriously people, am I not afraid enough?
Of course I am awared of the fact that things do happends in Israel. Of course I understand that it would, probably, be safer to stand home, but … I am not really afraid to travel there … should I be?

I am just saying that people that lives there, and people that traveled there comes back and tells me that: You will love it, and of course when I mention how people over here worries they say: “Yeah you should listen to the locals thy will give you recommendations if something happends, but its a city just like any other city and not. Its …. it´s … oh you just have to experience it!”

So who am I supposed to listen to.
I know things could happend.
I know the risk is increased when I travel somewhere close to conflicts.
But …
I also know that life is not certain wherever you might be.

Who says that I live tomorrow, or even four minutes from now. You could be hit by a bus, you could be stabbed to death on the u-bahn. Anything could happened to you, so tell me when am I supposed to stop and hide from doing things I want to do or visit places important for my education?

The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.
Mark Twain

Read Full Post »

Is it possible to be tolerant? When we have freedom of speech and religion are we never allowed to mess with it? A while ago we had a Swedish minister talking about homosexuals as cancer at the human body. The opinions in that case where different whether or not he was allowed to say that be course it counted as agitation against an ethnic group, but were it?

I mean it’s a horrible thing to say, because he just show the world that he is a know-nothing-prick and doesn’t deserve to be broadcasted, but … when did he cross the line between freedom of speech and agitation against an ethnic group? He spoke his opinion, should he be judge by that, who is the one setting the line between right and wrong, and what happens with freedom of speech if we are not allowed to speak our opinions (how foolish they might be)?

It’s not an easy question. There are a bit of the same thing with another occurrence we might see now and then. When are we letting religion take too much space in society? Is it a possibility to have balance between freedom of religion and other things in society?

We have had controversies when people feel discriminated because they can’t wear their religious outfit at work. The employer tells them: We have a dress code! And the job searching person says: Yeah I respect that but I need to wear this because it’s a part of my religion.
Who is right?

Is religion really suppose to stand above other laws in our society, if so, which religion is supposed to be in highest priority? And why? Is it really fair to say that you want to wear, for instance, burka, as a police? a nurse?, bus driver, firefighter?

Yeah I know the burka is the most instantly recognizable symbol of oppression and I am not intending to make a mockery of disempowered women who have been stripped of all human dignity. But it’s still a problem when you come to a school and somebody wants to teach kinder garden kids in a burka and says it’s a part of their religion. Are we allowed to point out the fact that burkas are not ” a traditional Islamic dress,” that burkas were made-up by fanatically fundamentalists and is a sign of oppression in our westernized word, therefore we should also be careful when it comes to a point when people claim that they are allowed to things be course it’s a part of their religion.

We have to, in fact we should be obligated to question such statement when we see that people uses their religion to justify oppression. In some cases it’s hard, in some cases we have to let people do and act in a certain way even though we are loathed when we face it. But sometimes we really have to put our foot down, because we should never allow terror or oppression of any kind.

The question is who and how shall we draw the lines?

Read Full Post »

In the local you can now read about this German man that wedded his gay partner in Canada four years ago won a partial victory this week when a Berlin court ruled that the partnership must be recognised, of course not as a marriage becourse that’s againts German law but …

No wait aminute, what kind of victory is that? I am well awared of the fact that in Germany the “registered partnership” law grants couples similar privileges to those of married spouses in areas including hospital visits, inheritance and stuff like that, but that’s not equality. Let every grown up have the dame right, its not that freaking hard…

And who gave the church right to the term “marriage” ? Cant we just decide that differentiating same-sex and opposite-sex couples in name is discrimination? Its not a win to get some sort of equality when its not equal at all…. We live in 2010, we can´t separate people from each other, instead of the civil partnership separate system for gays and lesbians we should just treat each other as humans.

And in the same time “M” writes about what happends in US where the weird proposition 8 trial is on and the closeing arguments will be up at Wednesday. They also argue about the same thing.

As I sad, Tomorrow there will be some closing arguments, which we can not watch on the Television since the judge rejected a request by media organizations to allow cameras in the courtroom. E seems to be afraid, I mean why is he hiding if he is judging a case of basic human rights.

There is no real question about it … This guy says it so well in his blog “I personally do not understand what your problem with gay people is, because you two really do not have many differences. You both wake up in the morning and go to work, you both strive to be good people, and you both seek love and companionship in your lives. Is it such a crime to want to be happy nowadays? “


So please you who argue against ..tell me what are you so afraid of?

Read Full Post »

They are to fucking stupid.

So finally I got the answer to why people eighter don´t vote or they vote at parties that supports racism. People are stupid! Honestly, how can they just listen to old racial prejudice and than they think that OH well that politician is probably right lets vote for him/her! They don´t even check up facts. I mean it´s shows everywhere doesn´t it?
Oh well, its not like I didn´t know that. I knew but I kind of ignored it cuz I really want people to be better than that! But no, they are not. They don´t read instructions, and if they read a magazine it simply doesn’t matter what the article sad, they believe it without questioning it because they think when its written its true?

Why am I writing this? Well I am tired of spam like…. “Put this up on your facebook/MSN/Linkedin, spread that at your twitter/mail/to all your friends …ITS TRUE!” And you know all the spam you get in your mailbox, I realized that people actually believe that they will get a bigger dick if they click at that link, that they actually won in a lottery that they never attended to, and that the picture of the guy that got ripped and super thin at 4 weeks is real…

It´s not strange that people vote for racists if they are to stupid to understand that they can not have a bath with their toaster (We have to write that it’s a NO NO in the manual)?
The question is what do we do about them, education is obviously not enough?

Read Full Post »